Pride And Prejudice By Jane Austen - 1615 Words

‘Pride and Prejudice’ and ‘Wuthering Heights’ both conform to an idealized happy ending within the category of love and marriages within them, as you most consider the meaning of ‘happy ending’ in both novels. In Jane Austen’s 1813 novel ‘Pride and Prejudice’, â€Å"a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a good wife, addressing the fixation of marriage for social progressionin thenineteenth-Century English society. In contrast, it is revealed in the book that the oppositeis true of a women wanting a husband, becausea single woman, in want of a husband above her social class.Men in 19th century England were considered to be rightful of someone or the daughters of a gentleman, for instance Mr. Bennet daughters. From†¦show more content†¦This content can be demonstrated by the choice that Elizabeth makes about marrying Darcy for love rather than status.On the contrary, Bronte s ‘Wuthering Heights’,could perhaps, be considered as being an realist contemplation on marriage as it indicates that problem lies in, social institutionas it is not conforming to the typical happy ending , in contrast to Austen’s novel. This can be discussed, thru thecausality of the protagonists and it can also be illustrated through the conflict that is between passion and romanticism and the demands of wealth that society requires of a person. However, one must consider the aim of both authors within their individual narrative spheres.Marriage and love can be seen as a device that can culminate the fate of the characters in Wuthering Heights and ‘Pride and Prejudice’. The significance, of moral topography, when Elizabeth visits Pemberley, as it is not simply the landscape that is being described by Austen, but it is seen as being an accurate depiction of Elizabeth’s judgement of Darcy as being a prospective suitor for her in marriage. It must be observed the blending of the human and natural world as Darcy s character can beexemplified by the visual scenery; â€Å"She had never seen a place for which nature had done more [that to be mistress of Pemberley might be something!]†, additionally, one can be